PELVIC-FLOOR REHABILITATION .1. COMPARISON OF 2 SURFACE ELECTRODE PLACEMENTS DURING STIMULATION OF THE PELVIC-FLOOR MUSCULATURE IN WOMEN WHO ARE CONTINENT USING BIPOLAR INTERFERENTIAL CURRENTS
C. Dumoulin et al., PELVIC-FLOOR REHABILITATION .1. COMPARISON OF 2 SURFACE ELECTRODE PLACEMENTS DURING STIMULATION OF THE PELVIC-FLOOR MUSCULATURE IN WOMEN WHO ARE CONTINENT USING BIPOLAR INTERFERENTIAL CURRENTS, Physical therapy, 75(12), 1995, pp. 1067-1074
Background and Purpose. Electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor is
used as an adjunct in the conservative treatment of urinary incontinen
ce. No consensus exists, however, regarding electrode placements for o
ptimal stimulation of the pelvic-floor musculature. The purpose of thi
s study was to compare two different bipolar electrode placements one
suggested by Laycock and Green (L2) the other by Dumoulin (D2), during
electrical stimulation with interferential currents of the pelvic-poo
r musculature in continent women, using a two-group crossover design.
Subjects. Ten continent female volunteers, ranging in age from 20 to 3
9 years ((X) over bar = 27.3, SD = 5.6), were randomly assigned to one
of two study groups. Methods. Each study group received neuromuscular
electrical stimulation (NMES) of the pelvic-floor musculature using b
oth electrode placements, the order of application being reversed for
each group. Force of contraction was measured as pressure (in centimet
ers of water [cm H2O]) exerted on a vaginal pressure probe attached to
a manometer. Data were analyzed using a two-way, mixed-model analysis
of variance. Results. No difference in pressure was observed between
the two electrode placements. Differences in current amplitude were ob
served With the D2 electrode placement requiring less current amplitud
e to produce a maximum recorded pressure on the manometer. Subjective
assessment by the subjects revealed a preference for the D2 electrode
placement (7 of to subjects). Conclusion and Discussion. The lower cur
rent amplitudes required with the D2 placement to obtain recordings co
mparable to those obtained with the L2 technique suggest a a more comf
ortable stimulation of the pelvic-floor muscles. The lower current amp
litudes required also suggest that greater increases in pressure might
be obtained with the D2 placement by increasing the current amplitude
while remaining within the comfort threshold. Measurements will help
to define treatment guidelines for a planned clinical study investigat
ing the effects of NMES and exercise in the treatment of urinary stres
s incontinence in women postpartum.