Cg. Petrikowski et al., RADIOGRAPHIC DIFFERENTIATION OF OSTEOGENIC-SARCOMA, OSTEOMYELITIS, AND FIBROUS DYSPLASIA OF THE JAWS, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 80(6), 1995, pp. 744-750
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,Surgery,"Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
Biopsy and histopathologic analysis may fail to consistently separate
osteogenic sarcoma, osteomyelitis, and fibrous dysplasia. Objectives.
To establish useful radiographic characteristics to differentiate thes
e diseases, an objective preliminary study of radiographs of 30 cases
of these diseases was done. Study design. After precisely defining sev
eral radiographic characteristics and completing a calibration study,
three observers unaware of the diagnosis examined study cases that wer
e randomly ordered. Results. Despite using trained observers and stric
t criteria, differentiation of the three conditions is difficult on th
e basis of radiographic features alone. in osteogenic sarcoma, the dis
tinguishing features were: permeative lesion borders. stippled bone pa
ttern, destruction of cortical outlines, perpendicular spiculations oi
periosteal new bone, destruction of lamina dura, and widening of the
entire periodontal ligament space. Presence of sequestra and laminatio
ns of periosteal new bone were the most useful distinguishing features
in cases of osteomyelitis that otherwise resemble fibrous dysplasia.
In fibrous dysplasia, superior displacement of the mandibular canal an
d a fingerprint bone pattern were pathognomonic, Displacement of the m
axillary sinus cortex, alteration of lamina dura to the abnormal bone
pattern, and narrowing si the periodontal ligament space were also use
ful distinguishing features. Conclusions. Our findings indicate that d
iagnosis cannot rely on radiographic characteristics alone, although s
ome radiographic findings were more useful than others.