Rs. Vanderheide et al., EFFECT OF CATECHOLAMINE DEPLETION ON MYOCARDIAL INFARCT SIZE IN DOGS - ROLE OF CATECHOLAMINES IN ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING, Cardiovascular Research, 30(5), 1995, pp. 656-662
Objectives: Cardioprotective adaptation to brief periods of ischemia a
nd reperfusion is termed ischemic preconditioning (PC). Limitation of
infarct size by preconditioning is associated with marked slowing of i
schemic metabolism. The cause of metabolic slowing has not been determ
ined but may involve either pro- or anti-adrenergic mechanisms. Hypoth
etically, adrenergic stimulation could signal the adaptive response. A
lternatively, metabolic slowing during the sustained ischemic challeng
e could occur through a reduction in beta-adrenergic stimulation. This
study was designed to test the role of cardiac norepinephrine (NE) in
PC. Methods: The effect of PC on myocardial infarct size was studied
in control dogs and dogs depleted of catecholamines by pretreatment wi
th reserpine (RES; 0.25 mg/kg i.v.). PC was induced by four cycles of
5 min of ischemia and 5 min of reperfusion. Infarcts were produced by
60 min of ischemia and 3 h of reperfusion. Cardiac NE depletion was ve
rified by radioimmunoassay of tissue samples and by absence of hemodyn
amic response to a tyramine bolus (1.4 mg/kg) administered at the end
of each experiment. Infarct size, expressed as percent of area at risk
, was controlled for variation in collateral blood flow using analysis
of covariance (ANCOVA). Results: Adjusted mean infarct size was 25.5
+/- 3.2% in untreated controls vs. 19.1 +/- 3.3% in RES-treated contro
ls (P = NS). PC limited infarct size in untreated dogs (7.4 +/- 1.8 vs
. 25.5 +/- 3.2%; PC vs. control; P < 0.01) but not in RES-treated dogs
(15.7 +/- 3.0% vs. 19.1 +/- 3.3%; RES + PC vs. RES; P = NS). Infarct
size was larger in dogs with RES + PC than with PC alone, even though
there was a trend toward a slight beneficial effect with RES alone. Co
nclusions: The cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning can
not be explained entirely as an anti-adrenergic effect. On the contrar
y, adrenergic receptor stimulation may be required for the full expres
sion of ischemic preconditioning in canine myocardium.