Gallup et al.'s (1995, Anim. Behav., 50, 1525-1532) defence of the vie
w that Gallup's mark test has provided evidence of self-recognition in
apes is countered point by point. The plausibility of the defence is
criticized because of poorly designed experiments, unreliable experime
ntal effects, illegitimate cross-experimental comparisons, false infer
ences and anecdotal observations. A recent attempt to fortify the case
using developmental data (Povinelli et al. 1993, J. comp. Psychol., 1
07, 347-372) was unsuccessful because it failed to find a reliable rel
ationship between age and mark test performance. Consequently, there i
s still no convincing evidence of self-recognition or mirror-guided bo
dy inspection in animals. An alternative research strategy is recommen
ded in which the self-recognition hypothesis is tested directly throug
h complete, carefully designed experiments. (C) 1995 The Association f
or the Study of Animal Behaviour