Vl. Caja et al., COMPARISON OF THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF 3 TYPES OF EXTERNAL FIXATORS - LINEAR, CIRCULAR AND HYBRID, Clinical biomechanics, 10(8), 1995, pp. 401-406
Different configurations of the Monticelli-Spinelli and llizarov exter
nal fixation systems were tested to define their mechanical properties
. In five configurations the external fixator consisted of rings with
tensioned wires (circular), while in one configuration two pairs of th
e tensioned wires and their correspondent ring were replaced by thread
ed pins (hybrid). Testing was performed in axial compression, bending
and torsion. The results were compared to the characteristics of a sel
ected linear fixator group. Both the circular and the hybrid configura
tions were non-linear in compression. In bending, circular fixators ha
d a similar pattern in both anteroposterior and oblique loading direct
ions. The bending load-displacement pattern for the hybrid fixators wa
s similar to the linear fixators, higher stiffness in the plane of the
pins. Torsion was linear for both circular and hybrid fixators, as fo
r the linear fixators. By combination of wires and pins (hybrid config
uration), the mechanical behaviour had characteristics from both linea
r and circular fixators. it is concluded that the three studied groups
own different mechanical performance and can be considered as differe
nt types of fixators. While it has been demonstrated that osteogenesis
can be achieved independently of the mechanical behaviour of the fixa
tor, this study supports the suggestion that some complications can be
related to the mechanical behaviour of the fixator. Relevance-This st
udy provides some guidelines for selecting the appropriated external f
ixator for clinical use depending upon the stiffness requirements of a
specific clinical case. Furthermore, the information on the mechanica
l characteristics of the different systems of external fixation permit
s some conclusions on the possible failures of the fixators during the
ir clinical application. However, the mechanical differences observed
cannot be utilized to support differences on the biology of the fractu
re or osteotomy foci where these types of fixators are used.