The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of changes in torso
position on arthrometric assessment of knee laxity. Anterior tibial t
ranslation (ATT) of 12 control and 12 ACL deficient subjects was asses
sed using a Dynamic Cruciate Tester during five maximal isometric knee
extensions and five passive tests (240 N load) on the right and left
knee in each of three torso positions: vertical, reclined, and supine.
Electromyographic activity of rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, bicep
s femoris, and semimembranosus were sampled during arthrometric assess
ment. Results indicated there was no significant difference in mean AT
T as a function of torso position. However, subjects demonstrated sign
ificantly greater hamstring activity when seated vertically compared t
o reclined or supine and significantly greater hamstring activity when
reclined compared to supine. Relevance--The findings of this study ha
ve provided a rationale for patient positioning during arthrometric as
sessment of knee laxity. That is, to minimize potential for hamstring
guarding which may compromise knee laxity results in the clinical sett
ing, arthrometric assessment of knee laxity in the sagittal plane shou
ld be conducted with patients in a supine position.