V. Panfilov et al., THE EFFECTS OF RILMENIDINE AND ATENOLOL ON MENTAL STRESS, DYNAMIC EXERCISE AND AUTONOMIC FUNCTION IN MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION, British journal of clinical pharmacology, 40(6), 1995, pp. 563-569
1 The effects of 4 week treatment with rilmenidine or atenolol on test
s of mental stress, dynamic exercise, autonomic function and psychomet
ric tests were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-contro
lled, cross-over study. 2 After a 4 week placebo run-in, 12 patients w
ith essential hypertension (blood pressure [BP] 160/95 +/- 15/7 mmHg)
received rilmenidine 1-2 mg day(-1), and atenolol 50-100 mg day(-1), e
ach for 4 weeks, with a 4 week placebo wash-out between drug treatment
s. 3 Both agents produced a comparable reduction in supine and erect B
P. During the mental arithmetic test, BP and heart rate (HR) responses
were similar for rilmenidine and atenolol. 4 During bicycle exercise,
the increase in HR was significantly greater after rilmenidine (+ 50
vs 41 beats min(-1), P = 0.04). During recovery, the areas under the c
urve for diastolic BP (46 450 vs 51 400 mmHg s, P = 0.02) and HR (49 4
45 vs 63 597 beats min(-1) s, P = 0.001) were significantly less with
atenolol than rilmenidine. 5 Neither rilmenidine nor atenolol affected
mental performance as judged by arithmetic and psychomotor tests. Phy
siological responses to autonomic function tests (deep breathing, faci
al immersion, isometric handgrip and cold presser) were preserved with
both drugs. The standing to lying ratio was higher on atenolol (P = 0
.01.) and Valsalva ratio was higher on rilmenidine (P = 0.03). 6 In co
nclusion, rilmenidine and atenolol exerted comparable antihypertensive
effects both at rest and during mental and dynamic stress. Atenolol a
ttenuated HR responses to dynamic exercise and the Valsalva manoeuvre;
rilmenidine did not interfere with the physiological responses of BP
and HR during autonomic function tests.