COMPARISON OF PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELLS MOBILIZED WITH GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR WITH OR WITHOUT PRIOR STANDARD-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANCY
N. Kobayashi et al., COMPARISON OF PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELLS MOBILIZED WITH GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR WITH OR WITHOUT PRIOR STANDARD-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANCY, Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(6), 1995, pp. 250-257
We studied the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the
magnitude of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with
malignancy. The leukapheresis products mobilized with granulocyte colo
ny-stimulating factor alone at a steady state (a period of full hemato
poietic recovery) (group 1) were compared with those obtained after cy
totoxic chemotherapy using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (grou
p 2). In group 1, six patients underwent six courses of stem cell coll
ection with a median of 20 1 leukapheresis. In group 2, 10 patients un
derwent 12 courses of stem cell collection with a median of 10 1 leuka
pheresis. Median yields of group 1 vs. group 2 were mononuclear cells
(x10(9)), 21.9 vs. 11.6; CD34(+) cells (x10(6)/l), 14.5 vs. 17.1; colo
ny-forming unit for granulocyte-macrophage (/ml), 223 vs. 1193; burst-
forming unit for erythroid (/ml), 29 vs. 71; colony-forming unit for e
rythroid (/ml), 42 vs. 29; colony-forming unit for megakaryocyte (/ml)
, 26 vs. 59. While there were no statistically significant differences
in the number of CD34(+) cells between the two groups, granulocyte-ma
crophage-committed progenitor cells were more enriched in the apheresi
s products of group 2. The correlation between CD34(+) cells and colon
y-forming unit for granulocyte-macrophage was poor. Our results demons
trate that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor can mobilize a suffic
ient number of progenitor cells into the peripheral blood for stem cel
l transplantation with or without prior chemotherapy.