ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN PREGNANCY AND FETAL ABNORMALITIES - SCREENING OR DIAGNOSTIC-TEST - IPIMC 1986-1990 REGISTER DATA

Citation
D. Baronciani et al., ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN PREGNANCY AND FETAL ABNORMALITIES - SCREENING OR DIAGNOSTIC-TEST - IPIMC 1986-1990 REGISTER DATA, Prenatal diagnosis, 15(12), 1995, pp. 1101-1108
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01973851
Volume
15
Issue
12
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1101 - 1108
Database
ISI
SICI code
0197-3851(1995)15:12<1101:UIPAFA>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the sensitivity of ultrasou nd diagnosis used as a screening test in detecting major congenital an omalies in the prenatal period in a large nation-based multicentre set ting. Data from the IPIMC register were collected in the period 1986-1 990. One hundred and thirty-five hospitals, located in 17 out of the 2 0 regions in Italy, participated in the register. Study cases were 347 9 infants with major congenital anomalies diagnosed at birth or in the first week of life. Subjects with chromosomal anomalies or multiple d efects were excluded. The sensitivity of ultrasound prenatal diagnosis was 49.5 per cent for central nervous system anomalies, 3.8 per cent for congenital heart diseases, 17.1 per cent for gastrointestinal trac t defects, 46.6 per cent for abdominal wall defects, 74.8 per cent for urinary tract anomalies, and 22.9 per cent for skeletal abnormalities . The detection rate for diaphragmatic hernia was 24.2 per cent. Overa ll, only 18 per cent of the defects diagnosed in utero were detected b efore 24 weeks' gestation. The sensitivity of prenatal diagnosis was 3 0.1 and 19.0 per cent in the northern, central, and southern regions, respectively. In light of its low sensitivity, ultrasonography as a sc reening test in the general population should be abandoned, although s ome improvement in its performance should be expected following adequa te training of the ultrasound staff and the use of good technical equi pment.