M. Rafique et al., MANAGEMENT OF GASTRIC-CANCER PATIENTS WITH SYNCHRONOUS HEPATIC METASTASIS - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY, Hepato-gastroenterology, 42(5), 1995, pp. 666-671
Background/Aims: In order to improve the management of patients of gas
tric cancer with synchronous hepatic metastasis, their records were re
trospectively studied. Materials and Methods: From January 1981 to Jul
y 1993, 558 gastric cancer patients were admitted in our institute. Tw
enty-five with synchronous hepatic metastasis were used in, this study
. Among these 25 patients, six had hepatic metastasis alone and ninete
en, had some other additional noncurative prognostic factors. For the
primary lesion, 12 patients received gastrectomy (total or distal subt
otal) and 13 patients did not. For the hepatic metastasis, 12 patients
had regional therapy (hepatectomy or hepatic arterial chemotherapy) a
nd 13 had not. Both gastrectomy and regional therapy for hepatic metas
tasis were carried out in 6 patients who had hepatic metastasis alone.
Results: Five year cumulative survival rate was 9% Survival rate of p
atients with hepatic metastasis alone was significantly better than th
e patients with additional noncurative factors (p<0.05). The two long
term survivors in this study had no other noncurative factors except h
epatic metastasis. Conclusions: Neither gastrectomy nor regional thera
py for hepatic metastasis had beneficial effects on the patients with
additional noncurative factors. Gastrectomy and regional therapy for h
epatic metastasis should be performed in patients without additional n
oncurative factors.