B. Hinney et al., REGULATION OF LUTEAL FUNCTION BY LUTEINIZING-HORMONE AND PROLACTIN ATDIFFERENT TIMES OF THE LUTEAL-PHASE, European journal of endocrinology, 133(6), 1995, pp. 701-717
In 54 healthy women luteal function was assessed by sequential withdra
wals of blood samples at 10-min internals for 8-10 h. Subgroups of the
women were studied during the early and late ovulatory period and dur
ing the early, mid- and late luteal phase. Bio- and immunoreactive lut
einizing hormone (LH), prolactin, testosterone, estradiol and progeste
rone levels were determined in each sample. While the bio- and immunor
eactivity of LH pulses correlated fairly well, a number of bio- or imm
unoreactive LH pulses were observed that were not detected by the resp
ective other method. Responsivity of the corpus luteum to LH episodes
developed during the second half of the luteal phase and was most mark
ed in cases where LH episodes were accompanied by prolactin episodes.
In the absence of prolactin episodes, LH episodes did not stimulate pr
ogesterone or estradiol secretion. The highest incidence of coincident
LH and prolactin pulses was observed during the mid- and late luteal
phase. Serum testosterone levels showed also some fluctuations but the
se were independent of immuno- or bioactive LH episodes and therefore
most likely not of luteal origin. Prior to menstruation LH episodes we
re not any more stimulatory to progesterone secretion, indicating that
it is not the withdrawal of LH but, rather, another possibly intraova
rian mechanism that results in luteolysis. In a number of women, incre
ased estradiol and progesterone secretion was strictly related to the
prior occurrence of LH and prolactin pulses. In other subjects, both g
onadal steroids fluctuated largely with no discernible correlation to
LH fluctuations. This may indicate that in these subjects the corpora
lutea have some degree of autonomous regulation.