People judged the inclination of hills viewed either out-of-doors or i
n a computer-simulated virtual environment. Angle judgments were obtai
ned by having people (1) provide verbal estimates, (2) adjust a repres
entation of the hill's cross-section, and (3) adjust a tilt board with
their unseen hand. Geographical slant was greatly overestimated accor
ding to the first two measures, but not the third. Apparent slant judg
ments conformed to ratio scales, thereby enhancing sensitivity to the
small inclines that must actually be traversed in everyday experience.
It is proposed that the perceived exaggeration of geographical slant
preserves the relationship between distal inclination and people's beh
avioral potential. Hills are harder to traverse as people become tired
; hence, apparent slant increased with fatigue. Visually guided action
s must be accommodated to the actual distal properties of the environm
ent; consequently, the tilt board adjustments did not reflect apparent
slant overestimations, nor were they influenced by fatigue, Consisten
t with the fact that steep hills are more difficult to descend than to
ascend, these hills appeared steeper when viewed from the top.