In this comment, we argue that although Farmer and Klein (1995) have p
rovided a valuable review relating deficits in nonreading tasks and dy
slexia, their basic claim that a ''temporal processing deficit'' is on
e possible cause of dyslexia is somewhat vague. We argue that ''tempor
al processing deficit'' is never clearly defined. Furthermore, we ques
tion some of their assumptions concerning an auditory temporal process
ing deficit related to dyslexia, and we present arguments and data tha
t seem inconsistent with their claims regarding how a visual temporal
processing deficit would manifest itself in dyslexic readers. While we
agree that some dyslexics have visual problems, we conclude that prob
lems with reading caused by the visual mechanisms that Farmer and Klei
n postulate are quite rare.