M. Szabo et al., MECHANISM OF THE INHIBITORY-ACTION OF RU486 ON THE SECONDARY FOLLICLE-STIMULATING-HORMONE SURGE, Endocrinology, 137(1), 1996, pp. 85-89
Recent evidence utilizing RU486 has implicated progesterone (P) and gl
ucocorticoids, in addition to a drop in serum inhibin, in the developm
ent of the secondary FSH surge on the morning of estrus. To assess the
role of these steroids, we treated proestrous female rats with the an
tiprogestin/antiglucocorticoid RU486 (6 mg/kg sc) at 1230 h, and with
dexamethasone (dex; 8.4 or 16.2 mg/kg sc), or with the steroid biosynt
hesis inhibitor aminoglutethimide (AG; 150 mg/kg ip) at 1030 h, alone
or in combination with RU486. The effects of these treatments on uteri
ne ballooning and intraluminal fluid content (an index of P action), o
vulation, and serum levels of P, corticosterone (B), FSH, LH, and inhi
bin-alpha at 1830 h proestrus and 0900 h estrus were examined. Tn acco
rd with previous work from our laboratory, RU486 caused uterine intral
uminal fluid retention on the morning of estrus and significantly supp
ressed the preovulatory surges of both FSH and LH, and the secondary s
urge of FSH without affecting the fall in inhibin-alpha. Treatment wit
h dex alone raised serum FSH at both 1830 h proestrus and 0900 h estru
s, coincident with suppression of serum inhibin-alpha. When administer
ed in combination with RU486, dex partially reversed the increased ute
rine intraluminal fluid retention at 0900 h estrus, but did not modify
the inhibitory effect of RU486 on the primary gonadotropin surges or
the secondary surge of FSH. AG alone sig nificantly suppressed serum P
, B, and gonadotropins (LH to a greater extent than FSH) at 1830 h pro
estrus and blocked ovulation and uterine intraluminal fluid release at
0900 h estrus; it did not, however, suppress the secondary FSH surge
or prevent the fall in serum inhibin-alpha. When administered 2 h befo
re RU486, AG did not prevent the RU486-induced inhibition of the prima
ry gonadotropin surges or the secondary FSH surge. We conclude from th
ese results that development of the secondary FSH surge does not requi
re P or glucocorticoid action and that RU486 suppression of the second
ary FSH surge does not involve blockade of binding of these steroids t
o their receptors. Our data are compatible with ligand-independent act
ivation of the P receptor, susceptible to blockade by RU486, as the me
chanism underlying the enhanced secretion of FSH from the gonadotrope
on the morning of estrus.