The aim of this article is to provide a critical review of both the ph
enomenology and the many and diverse generative (up to and including m
inimalist) analyses of null subjects and null objects. Data drawn from
a wide range of genetically unrelated and structurally diverse langua
ges indicate that the conditions that license and identify null subjec
ts and null objects remain to be fully, isolated, and that a single or
a few syntactic parameters may never be adequate in accounting for th
em. The reason is that different (groups of) languages may require dif
ferent licensing and identification strategies, some of which are clea
rly pragmatic/discourse in nature, as in the case of Chinese, Imbabura
Quechua, and Old Icelandic. As a step toward accounting for null subj
ects and null objects in these languages, the last section outlines a
novel approach to the identification of them, one couched in the neo-G
ricean pragmatic theory of anaphora IT have developed in Y. Huang (198
7, 1989, 1991a, 1991b, 1994, i.p.).