OBJECTIVE To examine the effectiveness of a formal tracking system for
residents' clinical experiences. DESIGN We examined three shifts, sel
ected at random, for each resident (without residents' knowledge) duri
ng emergency rotations. Information from patient charts was compared w
ith residents' computerized records for rotation (location and precept
or) and patient (age, sex, diagnosis, and procedure) information. SETT
ING The Northeastern Ontario Family Medicine Program, a program design
ed to provide remote, rural, and northern resident experience. PARTICI
PANTS First-, second-, and third-year residents on emergency rotations
in the academic years 1992 to 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Compliance,
reliability, and validity of tracking records. RESULTS Residents reco
rded patient encounters 88% of the time. Compliance with rotation info
rmation was high (100% rotation, 94% preceptor). Agreement on patient
age and sex was high. Procedure compliance was somewhat lower (83%). I
ntrarater reliability (91%) and inter-rater reliability (78%) are acce
ptably high, as is validity when compared with a gold standard entry (
88%). CONCLUSIONS Regular entry of reliable and valid data is facilita
ted by the computerized resident-patient encounter tracking program. T
his computer tool should prove useful for multilevel program evaluatio
n in the future.