F. Juanes et Ld. Smith, THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF LIMB DAMAGE AND LOSS IN DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS - A REVIEW AND PROSPECTUS, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology, 193(1-2), 1995, pp. 197-223
Autotomy, the reflex severance of an appendage, is considered an adapt
ation to avoid predators and limit wounds. While an autotomy response
may provide immediate survival benefits, the loss of one or more appen
dages can result in long-term functional and energetic costs. In this
paper, we present an overview of the incidence of limb damage and loss
in decapod crustaceans;review the literature on the ecological conseq
uences of such injury; and suggest areas for future research. A survey
of limb damage and loss in field populations showed consistently high
incidences of injury in 14 reviewed species. Typically, chelipeds wer
e the limb type lost most often and injuries were distributed symmetri
cally. No consistent correlation existed between injury frequency and
body size among species. In general, the frequency of injury was indep
endent of sex and moult stage. Fishery practices were responsible for
substantial limb loss in some commercial species. In terms of energeti
c costs, experiments demonstrated that limb injury could reduce growth
increment and affect intermoult duration. Functionally, limb damage w
as capable of reducing foraging efficiency and mating success, and inc
reasing vulnerability to intra- and interspecific attack. The magnitud
e of these effects depended on the type and number of limbs lost. Give
n the prevalence of injury in decapod crustacean populations, the cost
s involved, and the ecological importance of many crustacean species,
nonlethal injury has the potential to affect population dynamics and c
ommunity processes. Convincing evidence of autotomy's effects beyond t
he level of the individual, however, is, at present, lacking. Future w
ork should redress this shortcoming. In addition, comparative studies
are needed on decapod species from different habitats and with differe
nt lifestyles before generalizations can be made about the costs and b
enefits of autotomy.