EVALUATION OF THE MECHANISM FOR HIGHER PREGNANCY RATES IN DONOR OOCYTE RECIPIENTS BY COMPARISON OF FRESH WITH FROZEN EMBRYO-TRANSFER PREGNANCY RATES IN A SHARED OOCYTE PROGRAM

Citation
Jh. Check et al., EVALUATION OF THE MECHANISM FOR HIGHER PREGNANCY RATES IN DONOR OOCYTE RECIPIENTS BY COMPARISON OF FRESH WITH FROZEN EMBRYO-TRANSFER PREGNANCY RATES IN A SHARED OOCYTE PROGRAM, Human reproduction, 10(11), 1995, pp. 3022-3027
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
02681161
Volume
10
Issue
11
Year of publication
1995
Pages
3022 - 3027
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1161(1995)10:11<3022:EOTMFH>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the mechanism for higher pregnancy rates in oocyte recipients by comparing the pregnancy rates following fresh and frozen embryo transfers in a shared oocyte program me, A prospective study was carried out of 135 matched pairs of donors and recipients who equally share the donors' pool of oocytes, Recipie nts were subclassified by ovarian function: 69 were in ovarian failure and 66 retained ovarian function, A total of 474 standard in-vitro fe rtilization cycles using the same ovarian stimulation protocol as the donors were also evaluated, The main outcome measures were the clinica l pregnancy and implantation rates for donors and recipients following fresh and frozen embryo transfers, The clinical pregnancy rates per t ransfer for fresh embryo transfers were 17.5% for donors, 20.4% for re cipients with ovarian function and 46.3% for recipients in ovarian fai lure (P < 0.05), The pregnancy rates for frozen embryo transfers were 15.3% for donors, 17.2% for recipients with ovarian function and 23.8% for recipients in ovarian failure (not significantly different), The implantation rates for fresh transfers were 7.5% for donors, 8.6% for recipients with ovarian function and 15.6% for recipients in ovarian f ailure (P < 0.05); for frozen cycles, the implantation rates were 5.1, 5.2 and 7.1% respectively (not significantly different). When classif ied by age and ovarian function, the clinical pregnancy rates per tran sfer for recipients with ovarian function were 14.0% for those aged gr eater than or equal to 40 and 22.2% for those aged <40 years, For reci pients in ovarian failure, the pregnancy rates were 33.3% for the olde r group of women and 39.4% for the younger group, A logistic regressio n analysis found that ovarian function was the only factor to have an independent effect on outcome, The demonstration of higher pregnancy a nd implantation rates in recipients versus donors following fresh embr yo transfer, despite the use of a common pool of oocytes, strongly sug gests that the well-known higher fecundity found in recipients is not predominantly related to the use of better quality oocytes. The demons tration of an implantation rate twice as high following fresh versus f rozen embryo transfer in recipients with ovarian failure suggests that the frozen embryo Is not as hardy as the fresh embryo, Thus, the fact that both the pregnancy and implantation rates in donors were the sam e with fresh versus frozen embryo transfer suggests that the ovarian s timulation regimen has a negative effect on outcome, However, the clea r demonstration of higher pregnancy rates in recipients with ovarian f ailure compared with those with ovarian function suggests that, in add ition, these higher rates may be linked to a superior uterine environm ent in patients with ovarian failure, Alternatively, the use of gonado trophin-releasing hormone agonists may have a negative effect on impla ntation in patients with ovarian function.