Human subjects can pre-program movements on the basis of visual cues.
Experience in a particular task leads to the storage of appropriate co
ntrol parameters which are used in programming subsequent movements, v
ia a short-term motor memory. The form, duration and usage of this mem
ory are, however, uncertain. Repetitive wrist flexion and extension mo
vements were measured in four subjects. Three were neurologically norm
al men; the fourth subject had a peripheral large-fibre sensory neurop
athy, depriving him of proprioceptive information about wrist movement
. Subjects made alternating 45 degrees wrist movements between two vis
ual targets; visual feedback of wrist position was provided for the fi
rst part of each trial. After 10 s of tracking, the subjects paused fo
r an interval of 0-24 s before resuming tracking without visual feedba
ck of wrist position. The positional accuracy of subsequent movements
was analysed with respect to pause interval. Movement accuracy was red
uced by the removal of visual feedback in all four subjects: movements
after the pause interval were less accurate than those before the pau
se. Errors also accumulated within each sequence of movements made wit
hout visual feedback. Analysis of the first movement in each trial aft
er the pause indicated a clear relationship between movement accuracy
and pause interval. In all four subjects, movement accuracy decayed wi
th longer pause intervals. In the deafferented subject, manipulation o
f the visual inputs (requiring visual fixation, rather than normal pur
suit of the target; or direct viewing of the hand instead of viewing a
cursor on a computer screen) affected the relationship between pause
interval and subsequent movement accuracy. We propose that the memory
used when producing these movements is a short-lasting visuo-motor sig
nal, lasting a few seconds, which is derived from visual knowledge of
previous movements, rather than a memory of a particular motor output.
This visuo-motor signal is used to scale the amplitude of subsequent
wrist movements. The brevity of the visuo-motor memory and the resulta
nt inaccuracy of this deafferented subject and of our neurologically n
ormal subjects implies that human feedforward control of the amplitude
and position of wrist movements is severely limited.