The standard view is that value is added to raw material by labor and
capital. The question here discussed is whether or not raw material mu
st contain value previously added by nature, or whether it can be simp
ly inert indestructible building blocks. Can humanly added value subst
itute for value added by nature? If the answer were yes, it should be
possible, since matter-energy is not destroyed in consumption, to subs
titute the waste flow of matter-energy for the flow of fresh natural r
esources (raw materials). But this would contradict the second law of
thermodynamics. The quality of low entropy is what differentiates raw
material from waste, and we know of no process whose net effect is to
lower the entropy of the total system on which we depend. We must focu
s more on ''that to which value is added,'' and not just on value adde
d. This is especially true as the former more and more replaces the la
tter as the limiting factor in production. Further consequences of the
two different views about value added for theory and policy are discu
ssed.