Jm. Walker et al., PARTHENOGENETIC CNEMIDOPHORUS-TESSELATUS COMPLEX AT HIGBEE, COLORADO - RESOLUTION OF 30 YEARS OF CONTROVERSY, Copeia, (3), 1995, pp. 650-658
At times over 30 years, various authors have expressed conflicting opi
nions on the composition of the parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus tesselat
us complex at Higbee, Otero County, Colorado, the only known site of s
ympatry between diploid and triploid members of this complex. Recently
, some workers have stated that two rather than three distinctive part
henogens occur at Higbee, one being an undescribed triploid species (t
entatively designated pattern class C), which resulted from hybridizat
ion between C. tesselatus D(2n) and gonochoristic C. sexlineatus. Alte
rnatively, our study identified two diploid pattern classes [C(2n) and
D(2n)] and one triploid pattern class [B(3n)] among specimens of C. t
esselatus from Higbee (including those with electrophoretically determ
ined ploidy levels). We used two canonical variate analyses (CVA) to t
est hypotheses concerning the identity and origin of the triploid form
. CVA1 suggested that specimens of the Higbee triploid form represente
d C. tesselatus B(3n), not an undescribed species. CVA2 suggested that
C. tesselatus B(3n) was derived from a C. tesselatus C(2n) x C. sexli
neatus hybrid, not a hybrid involving C. tesselatus D(2n).