A. Evans et al., DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN-SITU OF THE BREAST - CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHIC AND PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS, American journal of roentgenology, 162(6), 1994, pp. 1307-1311
OBJECTIVE. Ductal carcinoma in situ shows heterogeneous clinical behav
ior and response to treatment depending on its pathologic features. Th
e aim of this study was to correlate the radiologic and pathologic fea
tures of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Differences, if prese
nt, may allow refinement of diagnosis and selection of treatment optio
ns. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The mammograms of 128 patients with ductal
carcinoma in situ of the breast were analyzed by a radiologist who kne
w that the patients had ductal carcinoma in situ but had no other path
ologic information. The radiologic and pathologic features of subgroup
s characterized according to cell size and presence of necrosis were t
hen compared. Statistical comparisons were made by using the chi(2)- a
nd Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS. Patients with small-cell ductal carc
inoma in situ more commonly have a normal mammogram (28% vs 6%, respec
tively, p < .001) or an abnormal mammogram without calcification (42%
vs 5%, respectively, p < .001) than do patients with large-cell ductal
carcinoma in situ. Among patients with abnormal mammographic findings
, calcification is present in 58% of those with small-cell ductal carc
inoma in situ, compared with 95% of those with large-cell ductal carci
noma in situ (p < .001). No significant differences were found in the
calcification morphology of small- and large-cell ductal carcinoma in
situ. These features were seen more commonly in ductal carcinoma in si
tu with necrosis than in ductal carcinoma in situ without necrosis, re
spectively: abnormal mammographic findings (95% vs 73%, p < .001), cal
cification (96% vs 61%, p < .001), calcification with a ductal distrib
ution (80% vs 45%, p < .005), and rod-shaped calcification (83% vs 45%
, p < .001). An abnormal mammogram without calcification (39% vs 4%, p
< .001) or predominantly punctate calcification (36% vs 13%, p < .05)
was seen more commonly in ductal carcinoma in situ without necrosis t
han in ductal carcinoma in situ with necrosis, respectively. CONCLUSIO
N. We have shown that the radiologic features of ductal carcinoma in s
itu vary according to cell size and the presence of necrosis in partic
ular. Necrosis has been found to be a feature of more biologically agg
ressive in situ breast cancer, so these findings may be of practical v
alue in deciding the management of indeterminate calcification cluster
s and whether to offer breast conservation.