G. Boucher et Pjd. Lambshead, ECOLOGICAL BIODIVERSITY OF MARINE NEMATODES IN SAMPLES FROM TEMPERATE, TROPICAL, AND DEEP-SEA REGIONS, Conservation biology, 9(6), 1995, pp. 1594-1604
Little is known about the biodiversity of free-living nematodes. We ha
ve attempted to provide baseline information about the natural diversi
ties (those not influenced by pollution) that might be expected in six
biotopes. Seventeen marine nematode data sets consisting of 197 sampl
es were standardized to allow a comparison of alpha diversity, or samp
le diversity, from temperature estuarine, tropical sublittoral, temper
ate sublittoral, bathyal, abyssal, and hadal biotopes, which were sele
cted on criteria of depth and latitude. The diversity analysis methods
we employed were rarefaction curves; three weighted diversity indices
of species richness, SR, H' and ES(X); and two equitability indices,
J' and V. Diversity was significantly different In the six biotopes. T
he weighted indices of species richness were more capable of resolving
differences between the biotopes than were the equitability indices,
whose large standard errors suggested that they were more influenced b
y local, small-scale ecological factors. This suggests that species ri
chness is a better measure than equitability for large-scale compariso
ns of biotopes or regions. The ES(X), which is robust to sample size v
ariations, was more efficient than the weighted indices of species ric
hness, which were easily influenced by sample size. There was a nonlin
ear relationship between depth and diversity with the bathyal and abys
sal biotopes displaying the highest diversity. The tropical sublittora
l biotope was not more diverse than the temperate sublittoral biotope.
The lowest diversifies were found in the physically challenging tempe
rate estuarine and hadal biotopes.