Mw. Vaniersel et al., FOLIAR METHANOL APPLICATIONS TO COTTON IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES - LEAF PHYSIOLOGY, GROWTH, AND YIELD COMPONENTS, Agronomy journal, 87(6), 1995, pp. 1157-1160
Foliar methanol applications have previously been reported to dramatic
ally increase yields of a variety of crops under arid conditions, incl
uding cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Whether methanol is effective in
the southeastern USA is not known. In addition, the agronomic and phy
siological events contributing to the increase are not understood. The
refore, we conducted a series of experiments in 1993 to study the effe
cts of methanol on the gas exchange, water relations,development, grow
th, and yield of field-grown cotton at three locations in the southeas
tern USA. Conventional management and irrigation procedures were used.
Methanol solutions in water, with and without urea and iron, were app
lied over the top at midday to cotton. Four to eight applications were
made from flowering to late bell filling. Both single-leaf and canopy
photosynthesis rates taken 2 h to 6 d after treatment were unaffected
by methanol or the nutrients. At one site, CO2 compensation point was
determined, but did not differ among treatments. This finding does no
t support previous claims that methanol reduces photorespiration. Tran
spiration and water potential also were not affected by foliar applica
tions of 15 or 30% methanol (v/v). Foliar methanol applications also d
id not result in faster development of the crop and did not increase y
ield at any of the locations. Our results do not indicate any positive
effect of foliar methanol applications on cotton in the southeastern
USA.