THE EFFECTS OF ALTERED EXERCISE DISTRIBUTION ON LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATIONS

Citation
Cr. Host et al., THE EFFECTS OF ALTERED EXERCISE DISTRIBUTION ON LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATIONS, European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 72(1-2), 1995, pp. 157-164
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
ISSN journal
03015548
Volume
72
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
157 - 164
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-5548(1995)72:1-2<157:TEOAED>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
The effects of exercise distribution on lymphocyte count, lymphocyte s ubpopulations and plasma cortisol concentration in peripheral blood we re assessed in 19 healthy subjects. The subjects were randomly divided into group A (n = 10) or group B (n = 9) according to exercise distri bution. Both groups underwent a 10-week programme involving 5x2-week b locks: baseline (B), training period 1 (TP1), stabilisation 1 (S1), tr aining period 2 (TP2), and stabilisation 2 (S2). During B, S1 and S2 n ormal training was undertaken. During TP1 and TP2 the subjects increas ed the amount of training by 50% in week 1 and by 100% in week 2. Duri ng TP1 subjects in group A exercised 6 days . week(-1), while during T P2 these subjects exercised on 3 alternate days . week(-1), but double d the duration of each training session. The subjects in group B rever sed this training order. Blood was collected 36-42 h following exercis e period B, and at the end of periods TP1, S1, TP2 and 52, and also 12 -18 h following completion of exercise at the end of TP1 and TP2. Ther e were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the 6 day . week( -1) programme and the 3 alternate day . week(-1) programme in total ly mphocyte count, CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+), CD16(+), or CD19(+) cells, the CD4:CD8 ratio, HLA-DR(+) (activated)T cells or plasma cortisol concen trations. Following both TP1 and TP2 there was a nonsignificant decrea se in lymphocyte subpopulations. However following both S1 and S2 (bas eline training) there was a significant increase in total lymphocyte c ount, CD3(+), CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes. The S2 variables statisti cally significant from B were: total lymphocyte count (P < 0.01), CD3( +) T-cells and percentage of circulating lymphocytes (P < 0.01), CD4() cells (P less than or equal to 0.0001), CD8(+) cells (P < 0.05), and HLA-DR(+) (activated) T-cells (P < 0.05). The results indicated that provided the amount of exercise is constant for a given period, then e xercise distribution is not a critical variable in the alteration of l ymphocyte subpopulations that may occur in response to overload traini ng. However 2 weeks of overload training followed by 2 weeks of active recovery (baseline) training may induce an increase in the lymphocyte count.