VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION OF ADULT EUCALYPTUS-GRANDIS X UROPHYLLA AND COMPARISON OF GROWTH BETWEEN MICROPROPAGATED PLANTLETS AND ROOTED CUTTINGS

Citation
Jc. Yang et al., VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION OF ADULT EUCALYPTUS-GRANDIS X UROPHYLLA AND COMPARISON OF GROWTH BETWEEN MICROPROPAGATED PLANTLETS AND ROOTED CUTTINGS, Plant cell reports, 15(3-4), 1995, pp. 170-173
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
07217714
Volume
15
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
170 - 173
Database
ISI
SICI code
0721-7714(1995)15:3-4<170:VPOAEX>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Methods for the production of micropropagated plantlets and rooted cut tings were developed and used to vegetatively multiply adult Eucalyptu s grandis X urophylla. Rooting success was less than 5% when cuttings excised from twigs of 3-year-old trees were used. The rooted cuttings were grown in the greenhouse as explant- or cutting-donors and maintai ned at a height of 30 to 100 cm by trimming back periodically. Good ro oting success (95%) of cuttings was obtained for epicormic shoots prod uced from donor plants after trimming 5 times. Explants of both apical and axillary buds taken from the donor plants produced multiple shoot s when cultured in vitro. In vitro multiple shoot production was optim al on MS medium containing 0.1 mg/l BA and 0.01 mg/l NAA, averaging 13 .7 shoots per explant in a 40-day culture period. Shoot elongation was accelerated on a modified MS medium containing half strength potassiu m nitrate and sucrose. Elongated shoots excised at approximately 1.5 c m in length were successfully rooted on media with NAA or IBA concentr ations ranging from 0.1 to 10 mg/l. Root formation was optimal on medi um consisting of full strength MS basal macro elements and vitamins, h alf strength micro elements, 1% sucrose and supplemented with 0.3 mg/l IBA. In the field test, no significant differences were found in tree height and DBH between micropropagated plantlets and rooted cuttings at I and 3 years old, with the exception at 2 years old. A considerabl e difference arose between the 2 types of vegetative propagules in phy siological response to flowering, caused by dissimilar degrees of reju venation.