Ml. Whitehead et al., EFFECTS OF EAR-CANAL STANDING WAVES ON MEASUREMENTS OF DISTORTION-PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(6), 1995, pp. 3200-3214
At frequencies above kHz standing waves in the ear canal complicate ca
libration of stimulus sound-pressure levels (SPLs) for measurements of
distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). In the literature,
two stimulus-presentation strategies have been used for DPOAE measure
ments. In the ''in-the-ear adjustment'' strategy, the voltage command
to the speakers is adjusted to maintain a constant stimulus SPL across
frequency at the DPOAE-measurement microphone. In the ''iso-voltage''
strategy, the voltage presented to the speakers is held constant acro
ss frequency, on the basis of the assumption that the frequency respon
se of the speakers is approximately flat at the eardrum in the average
human ear canal. Because of standing-wave effects, there are large, s
ystematic but idiosyncratic differences of stimulus SPL between the tw
o strategies. DPOAE-versus-frequency functions (''DPOAE audiograms'')
obtained using both stimulus-presentation strategies in the same ears
are presented. The differences of stimulus SPL between the two strateg
ies, and the associated differences of DPOAE amplitude, are described
and quantified. Around frequencies of standing-wave minima at the DPOA
E probe, the in-the-ear adjustment strategy resulted in smaller DPOAEs
at high L(1)=L(2), but much larger DPOAEs at low L(1) =L(2), than did
the iso-voltage strategy. For any L(1), the DPOAE-amplitude differenc
es between the two strategies varied systematically with L(1)-L(2) At
the stimulus levels used to construct previously published population
norms for clinical applications (i.e., L(1) greater than or equal to 6
5 dB SPL), there are only small differences of mean DPOAE amplitudes,
and of the standard deviations of these means, between the two strateg
ies. (C) 1995 Acoustical Society of America.