Br. Migeon et al., LACK OF X INACTIVATION ASSOCIATED WITH MATERNAL X ISODISOMY - EVIDENCE FOR A COUNTING MECHANISM PRIOR TO X INACTIVATION DURING HUMAN EMBRYOGENESIS, American journal of human genetics, 58(1), 1996, pp. 161-170
We have previously reported functional disomy for X-linked genes in fe
males with tiny ring X chromosomes and a phenotype significantly more
abnormal than Turner syndrome. In such cases the disomy results from f
ailure of these X chromosomes to inactivate because they lack DNA sequ
ences essential for cis X inactivation. Here we describe a novel molec
ular mechanism for functional X disomy that is associated with materna
l isodisomy. In this case, the severe mental retardation and multiple
congenital abnormalities in a female with a mosaic 45,X/ 46,X,del(X) (
q21.3-qter)/ 46X,r(X) karyotype are associated with overexpression of
the genes within Xpter to Xq21.31 in many of her cells. Her normal X,
ring X, and deleted linear X chromosomes originate from the same mater
nal X chromosome, and all are transcriptionally active. None expresses
X inactive specific transcript (XIST), although the locus and region
of the putative X inactivation center (XIC) are present on both normal
and linear deleted X chromosomes. To our knowledge, this is the first
report of a functional maternal X isodisomy, and the largest X chromo
some to escape inactivation. In addition, these results (1) show that
cis inactivation does not invariably occur in human females with two X
chromosomes, even when the XIC region is present on both of them; (2)
provide evidence for a critical time prior to the visible onset of X
inactivation in the embryo when decisions about X inactivation are mad
e; and (3) support the hypothesis that the X chromosome counting mecha
nism involves chromosomal imprinting, occurs prior to the onset of ran
dom inactivation, and is required for subsequent inactivation of the c
hromosome.