EPIDEMIOLOGY OF RECREATIONAL AND OLD-TIMER ICE HOCKEY INJURIES

Citation
Dc. Voaklander et al., EPIDEMIOLOGY OF RECREATIONAL AND OLD-TIMER ICE HOCKEY INJURIES, Clinical journal of sport medicine, 6(1), 1996, pp. 15-21
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Sport Sciences",Orthopedics,Physiology
ISSN journal
1050642X
Volume
6
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
15 - 21
Database
ISI
SICI code
1050-642X(1996)6:1<15:EORAOI>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Objective: To examine the nature and incidence of injuries suffered by a sample of recreational and old-timer ice hockey players. Design: Ra ndom sample of teams followed prospectively. Setting: Various hockey r inks in the Greater Edmonton Region. Participants: Four hundred and th irty-one subjects-287 adult male recreational (AMRL) and 144 male old- timer (OTL) from five leagues were followed over the 1992-93 hockey se ason. Main Outcome Measures: Injuries sustained during the duration of a hockey season. Results: A total of 151 injuries (100 AMRL and 51 OT L) were reported. The aggregate injury rate was 12.2/1000 player-expos ures (12.3 AMRL and 12.0 OTL). The anatomic region most often injured by AMRL players was the head/neck/facial area (32%) while OTL players reported a greater proportion of lower extremity injuries (40%), Both groups reported sprains/strains as the most common diagnosis (35% AMRL and 47% OTL). The pre dominant injury mechanism for AMRL players was stick contact (24%) and for OTL players was puck contact (23%). No sig nificant differences were detected between the anatomic, diagnostic, a nd mechanistic distributions of injury between AMRL and OTL players. S eventy-five percent of injuries occurred during league games, 10% duri ng playoff games, 5% during tournament games, and 10% during practices . Penalties were assessed in 31% of injury instances, Forty-two percen t of head/neck/facial injuries, 32% of upper extremity injuries, 13% o f torso injuries, and 15% of lower extremity occurred as a result of p enalizable behavior (p = 0.01). Three percent of players wearing full or half face protectors suffered facial injuries while 9% of players n ot wearing facial protection reported facial injuries (p = 0.03; Relat ive Risk = 2.56). Conclusions: The injury rates observed were lower th an reported rates for major/elite hockey. The proportion of players in jured through body contact was lower than that observed in adult major /elite hockey while the diagnostic and anatomic distribution of injury was similar. Studies such as this are useful in the development of in jury prevention strategies.