Objective: To examine the nature and incidence of injuries suffered by
a sample of recreational and old-timer ice hockey players. Design: Ra
ndom sample of teams followed prospectively. Setting: Various hockey r
inks in the Greater Edmonton Region. Participants: Four hundred and th
irty-one subjects-287 adult male recreational (AMRL) and 144 male old-
timer (OTL) from five leagues were followed over the 1992-93 hockey se
ason. Main Outcome Measures: Injuries sustained during the duration of
a hockey season. Results: A total of 151 injuries (100 AMRL and 51 OT
L) were reported. The aggregate injury rate was 12.2/1000 player-expos
ures (12.3 AMRL and 12.0 OTL). The anatomic region most often injured
by AMRL players was the head/neck/facial area (32%) while OTL players
reported a greater proportion of lower extremity injuries (40%), Both
groups reported sprains/strains as the most common diagnosis (35% AMRL
and 47% OTL). The pre dominant injury mechanism for AMRL players was
stick contact (24%) and for OTL players was puck contact (23%). No sig
nificant differences were detected between the anatomic, diagnostic, a
nd mechanistic distributions of injury between AMRL and OTL players. S
eventy-five percent of injuries occurred during league games, 10% duri
ng playoff games, 5% during tournament games, and 10% during practices
. Penalties were assessed in 31% of injury instances, Forty-two percen
t of head/neck/facial injuries, 32% of upper extremity injuries, 13% o
f torso injuries, and 15% of lower extremity occurred as a result of p
enalizable behavior (p = 0.01). Three percent of players wearing full
or half face protectors suffered facial injuries while 9% of players n
ot wearing facial protection reported facial injuries (p = 0.03; Relat
ive Risk = 2.56). Conclusions: The injury rates observed were lower th
an reported rates for major/elite hockey. The proportion of players in
jured through body contact was lower than that observed in adult major
/elite hockey while the diagnostic and anatomic distribution of injury
was similar. Studies such as this are useful in the development of in
jury prevention strategies.