Aims-To assess the quality of centres contributing antimicrobial susce
ptibility data to a centralised database. Methods-Twelve organisms wer
e distributed to 31 regional microbiology laboratories contributing da
ta to a centralised susceptibility database. Participants were asked t
o determine susceptibilities to certain antibiotics by their routine m
ethod and return the data to the Department of Microbiology, Royal Hal
lamshire Hospital, Sheffield, for analysis. Results-Results for the ov
erwhelming majority of organism/antibiotic combinations were in agreem
ent with expected results. Reasons for discrepancies included suscepti
bilities, the use of different content discs, and, more importantly, m
inimum inhibitory concentrations falling close to breakpoint values. C
onclusions-It is inevitable that any large multicentre database will c
ontain a degree of inaccurate data. This study has highlighted several
areas where discrepant results have occurred and has enabled Glare La
boratories to approach individual laboratories to address this problem
. This study emphasises the value and consistency of Microbe Base as t
he largest database, of its kind, nationally.