This study describes the first two years of an obstetric liaison servi
ce between the Liverpool Drug Dependency Clinic and the two local mate
rnity hospitals. The service comprised, medical officer, drug liaison
midwife and a designated obstetrician at each of the hospitals. A tota
l of 88 women were seen from whom there were 60 deliveries producing 6
1 babies. Only two women delivered without either service identifying
their pregnancy. This compares to a previous estimated rate of 75% of
drug users being undetected by the obstetric services. The amount of m
ethadone a woman was taking did not predispose to any specific obstetr
ic intervention. There was a higher rate of small for gestational age
babies in this group but other factors may be more important than a mo
thers drug use. Higher levels of maternal methadone did not reduce foe
tal weight. There was a tendency to increase the risk of neonatal opia
te withdrawal symptoms and premature labour with higher doses of metha
done, although this requires further study. The multidisciplinary appr
oach of the Liverpool Drug Dependency Clinic allowed in a majority of
cases for assessments prior to delivery, so reducing the number of cri
sis child protection conferencing after birth. The multidisciplinary t
eam endeavoured to establish normalisation policies for other health c
are workers who have contact with pregnant drug users on treatment, an
d in so doing, encouraged a change in the general midwifery staffs att
itudes, to be more positive and accepting rather than discriminatory.
We suggest that prescribing methadone within a harm reduction philosop
hy has produced acceptable outcomes for opiate dependent women and the
ir babies.