Local search methods for combinatorial optimization make a series of s
teps, at each stage improving the current solution by moving to a neig
hbouring solution. This is usually done by considering the neighbourin
g solutions one at a time and moving to the first one which gives an i
mprovement (a first improving method). In this paper we consider wheth
er there are circumstances in which some other strategy will have bett
er performance. In exploring this question we begin by giving a theore
tical treatment of a simple model with random objective values at each
solution point. We carry out some experiments on the Travelling Sales
man Problem and the Quadratic Assignment Problem using varying values
of a spread parameter, kappa. The value of kappa corresponds to the nu
mber of improving solutions looked at before making a move. We also ma
ke some conjectures relating the overall performance of the local sear
ch method to the average number of solutions which are evaluated befor
e a local minimum is reached.