It is commonly believed that learning is based on modifications of syn
aptic strength. Much of the evidence for this comes from the observati
on that blockade of processes necessary for induction of long-term pot
entiation in the hippocampus also blocks certain forms of learning. As
such correlations may have many causes, an understanding of the mecha
nisms for memory formation might also profit from direct recording of
cellular activity in learning tasks. Field potential recording represe
nts one such approach. Although changes in field potentials are unlike
ly to uncover modifications in synaptic strength related to the storag
e of memory, any general facilitation (or reduction) of synaptic trans
mission taking place in populations of neurons during the acquisition
stage might be picked up by a field measure. One problem related to th
e approach is that field potentials are heavily affected by nonlearnin
g factors. It is shown that field potentials in the hippocampus are hi
ghly sensitive to changes in brain temperature and that a significant
part of the increase in field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (f-EP
SPs) during learning reflects warming of the brain. Temperature-relate
d changes in synaptic transmission do not affect the efficiency of spa
tial learning, as the acquisition of a water-maze task is equally effi
cient at low (30-32 degrees C) and high (37-39 degrees C) brain temper
atures. Subtraction of the temperature component of the held potential
alterations during learning in an exploration task shows that explora
tion is accompanied by a temperature-independent synaptic potentiation
as well. Both the f-EPSP and the population spike are increased, and
both decay gradually within 15-20 min. It is important to find out whe
ther this potentiation reflects learning-related processes and whether
such a potentiation is useful to the brain given the apparent 'noise'
caused by temperature-related physiological changes.