PHARMACOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS OF METACHLOROPHENYLPIPERAZINE

Citation
A. Bourson et al., PHARMACOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS OF METACHLOROPHENYLPIPERAZINE, Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior, 53(1), 1996, pp. 107-114
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Pharmacology & Pharmacy
ISSN journal
00913057
Volume
53
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
107 - 114
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-3057(1996)53:1<107:PEOTDS>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
A pharmacologic analysis of the discriminative stimulus of metachlorop henylpiperazine (mCPP) is reported. mCPP and m-trifluoromethylphenylpi perazine generalised, whereas hoxy-3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-4-pyridinyl)- 1H-indole, 6-chloro-2-(1-piperazinyl)-pyrazine, and mesulergine partia lly generalised to the mCPP discriminative cue. However, although mian serin, methiothepin, ritanserin, mesulergine and N-(1-methyl-5'-indoly l)-N'-(3-pyridyl)urea hydrochloride (SE 200646) all antagonised the ef fect of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) on IP3 formation in the rat choroid plexus, they failed to antagonise the mCPP response in the drug discr imination studies. The 5-HT3 receptor antagonist MDL 72222 neither gen eralised nor antagonised the mCPP cue. These data suggest that neither the 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, 5-HT2C, 5-HT3, 5-HT5, 5-H T6, nor 5-HT7 receptors are involved. The response does appear to be m ediated by a postsynaptic 5-HT receptor, however, because fenfluramine generalised to the cue. Haloperidol generalises, and amphetamine part ially antagonises the mCPP discriminative cue and low doses of apomorp hine partially generalises to the mCPP cue, which suggests that a decr ease in dopamine neurotransmission may also be involved.