A. Bourson et al., PHARMACOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS OF METACHLOROPHENYLPIPERAZINE, Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior, 53(1), 1996, pp. 107-114
A pharmacologic analysis of the discriminative stimulus of metachlorop
henylpiperazine (mCPP) is reported. mCPP and m-trifluoromethylphenylpi
perazine generalised, whereas hoxy-3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-4-pyridinyl)-
1H-indole, 6-chloro-2-(1-piperazinyl)-pyrazine, and mesulergine partia
lly generalised to the mCPP discriminative cue. However, although mian
serin, methiothepin, ritanserin, mesulergine and N-(1-methyl-5'-indoly
l)-N'-(3-pyridyl)urea hydrochloride (SE 200646) all antagonised the ef
fect of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) on IP3 formation in the rat choroid
plexus, they failed to antagonise the mCPP response in the drug discr
imination studies. The 5-HT3 receptor antagonist MDL 72222 neither gen
eralised nor antagonised the mCPP cue. These data suggest that neither
the 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, 5-HT2C, 5-HT3, 5-HT5, 5-H
T6, nor 5-HT7 receptors are involved. The response does appear to be m
ediated by a postsynaptic 5-HT receptor, however, because fenfluramine
generalised to the cue. Haloperidol generalises, and amphetamine part
ially antagonises the mCPP discriminative cue and low doses of apomorp
hine partially generalises to the mCPP cue, which suggests that a decr
ease in dopamine neurotransmission may also be involved.