Jm. Hutchinson et al., ENTHALPY RELAXATION IN A PARTIALLY CURED EPOXY-RESIN, Journal of polymer science. Part B, Polymer physics, 34(2), 1996, pp. 229-239
The enthalpy relaxation of a partially cured (70%) epoxy resin, derive
d from diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A cured by methyl-tetrahydrophtha
lic anhydride with accelerator, has been investigated. The key paramet
ers of the structural relaxation (the apparent activation energy Delta
h, the nonlinearity parameter x, and the nonexponentiality parameter
beta) are compared with those of the fully cured epoxy resin. The agi
ng rates, characterized by the dependences of the enthalpy loss and pe
ak temperature on log(annealing time), are greater in the partially cu
red epoxy than they are in the fully cured resin at an equivalent agin
g temperature (T-a = T-g - 20 degrees C). There is a significant reduc
tion in Delta h, from 1100 kJ mol(-1) for the fully cured system to 6
15 kJ mol(-1), as the degree of cure is reduced. The parameter x deter
mined by the peak-shift method appears essentially independent of the
degree of cure (x = 0.41 +/- 0.03 for the partially cured resin compar
ed with 0.42 +/- 0.03 obtained previously for the fully cured resin),
and does not follow the usually observed correlation of increasing x a
s Delta h decreases. This invariability of the parameter x seems to i
ndicate that it is determined essentially by the local chemical struct
ure of the backbone chain, and rather little by the supramolecular str
ucture. On the other hand, the estimated nonexponentiality parameter b
eta lies between 0.3 and 0.456, which is significantly lower than in t
he fully cured epoxy (beta approximate to 0.5), indicative of a broade
ning of the distribution of relaxation times as the degree of cross-li
nking is reduced. Like the parameter x, this also does not follow the
usual correlation with Delta h. These results are discussed in the fr
amework of strong and fragile behavior of glass-forming systems, but i
t is difficult to reconcile these results in any simple way with the c
oncept of strength and fragility. (C) 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.