M. Aspinwall, INTERNATIONAL INTEGRATION OR INTERNAL POLITICS - ANATOMY OF A SINGLE MARKET MEASURE, Journal of Common Market studies, 33(4), 1995, pp. 475-499
The question of who is responsible for integrative outcomes has bedevi
lled scholars since the creation of the European Coal and Steel Commun
ity in 1952. Theories of integration from international relations focu
s on the influence of the state, and how that may be eroded by non-gov
ernmental and supranational actors. Comparativists, on the other hand,
have applied lessons from domestic politics to the integration proces
s. This is an attempt to bridge the two through a detailed case study
of one Single Market measure: the first stage of a Common Shipping Pol
icy (CSP). Shipping, while extremely important economically, is a rela
tively obscure sector politically. Pressure groups, therefore, are imp
ortant sources of motivation for both Member States and the supranatio
nal institutions. A number of independent variables leading to agreeme
nt on the policy are spelled out, and a tentative hypothesis is offere
d to explain the conditions under which interstate cleavages are super
seded by inter-group cleavages, leading to the sort of bargaining one
sees in a domestic polity.