RUTHENIUM(II) COMPLEXES WITH 1,4,5,8,9,12-HEXAAZATRIPHENYLENE AND 1,4,5,8-TETRAAZAPHENANTHRENE LIGANDS - KEY ROLE PLAYED BY THE PHOTOELECTRON TRANSFER IN DNA CLEAVAGE AND ADDUCT FORMATION
Jp. Lecomte et al., RUTHENIUM(II) COMPLEXES WITH 1,4,5,8,9,12-HEXAAZATRIPHENYLENE AND 1,4,5,8-TETRAAZAPHENANTHRENE LIGANDS - KEY ROLE PLAYED BY THE PHOTOELECTRON TRANSFER IN DNA CLEAVAGE AND ADDUCT FORMATION, Inorganic chemistry, 34(26), 1995, pp. 6481-6491
The interaction and photoreaction of a series of ruthenium(II) complex
es containing 1,4,5,8,9,12-hexaazatriphenylene (hat) and 1,4,5,8-tetra
azaphenanthrene (tap) ligands with nucleotides and DNA have been studi
ed. The rate constant of quenching of the excited states of the comple
xes by guanosine-5'-monophosphate (GMP) is shown to depend on the redu
ction potentials of the metal complex excited state, suggesting that t
he quenching is due to electron transfer from the guanine. The more st
rongly oxidizing metal complex excited state species are also quenched
by adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP). Electron transfer has been verif
ied for Ru(hat)(3)(2+), Ru(tap)(3)(2+), and Ru(tap)(2)(hat)(2+) by las
er flash photolysis, which indicates the formation of Ru(I) species an
d oxidized nucleotide intermediates with cage escape yields in the ran
ge 20-35%. Application of the Marcus theory yields a value of 1.16 V (
vs NHE) for E(G.+/G) in GMP. The luminescence from Ru(hat)(3)(2+), Ru(
tap)(3)(2+), Ru(tap)(2)L(2+), or Ru(hat)(2)L(2+) (L = 2,2'-bipyridine
or 1,10-phenanthroline) is also quenched when the complexes are bound
to DNA, and these oxidizing complexes are shown to be more efficient p
hotosensitisers for single strand breaks in plasmid DNA. Covalently bo
und adducts are formed between the metal complexes and calf thymus DNA
for those complexes whose excited states can oxidize guanine.