P. Rohner et al., COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF BACTEC AEROBIC PLUS F AND SEPTI-CHEK RELEASE BLOOD CULTURE MEDIA/, Journal of clinical microbiology, 34(1), 1996, pp. 126-129
The BACTEC 9240 (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md,) automated blood cultur
e system is based on the continuous monitoring of CO, production by me
ans of a fluorescent sensor attached to the bottom of culture vials, W
e compared the performance of the BACTEC aerobic Plus/F medium to that
of the Septi-Chek Release medium (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.), a m
anual biphasic blood culture system, Sets consisting of BACTEC aerobic
Plus/F and Septi-Chek Release vials inoculated with similar volumes (
7 +/- 2 mi) were evaluated, In the laboratory, systems were equipped a
nd analyzed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The BACTE
C and Septi-Chek vials were incubated at 35 degrees C for 5 days. A to
tal of 6,116 compliant sets were obtained from 1,972 adult patients (3
.1 cultures per patient), Of these, 731 (12%) were culture positive, i
ncluding 612 (10%) that yielded at least one pathogen, and 143 (2%) we
re considered to be contaminated, Of the 672 pathogenic organisms dete
cted, 524 were isolated from the BACTEC aerobic Plus/F medium and 574
were isolated from the Septi-Chek Release medium, 428 organisms grew i
n both media, 96 organisms grew only in the BACTEC aerobic Plus/F medi
um, and 146 organisms grew only in the Septi-Chek Release medium (P =
0.001), Haemophilus spp, were isolated more often (P = 0.03) from the
BACTEC aerobic Plus/F medium; however, more Streptococcus anginosus or
ganisms (P = 0.02), members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (P < 0.03
), and gram-negative anaerobes (P = 0.03) were isolated from the Septi
-Chek Release medium, Pathogenic organisms were detected significantly
earlier (P < 0.0001) with the BACTEC aerobic Plus/F medium in conjunc
tion with the BACTEC 9240 instrument than with the Septi-Chek Release
medium.