PURPOSE: To determine if magnetic resonance (MR) imaging enables diffe
rentiation of adhesions from tendon rupture after repair of digital fl
exor tendon injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The reference group compr
ised eight tendon sutures with a good clinical outcome. Axial and sagi
ttal spin-echo sequences and three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences
with curved reconstructions were analyzed in 63 injured fingers. Reop
eration was performed in 41 fingers. RESULTS: MR imaging depicted isol
ated peritendinous adhesions (n = 31), most often with a continuous, u
niform tendon (sensitivity 91%, specificity 100%). There were two type
s of rupture: frank rupture (n = 140; sensitivity 100%, specificity 10
0%) or elongated callus (n = 18; sensitivity 100%, specificity 94%). T
endon gap was significantly longer in frank rupture (P = .0011). Thin
fibrous continuity existed with elongated callus. Tenolysis was suffic
ient when the callus was short and mature with predominant new collage
n fibers. Axial spin-echo sections were essential, as they showed the
maturation of the callus. CONCLUSION: MR imaging may enable-distinctio
n among several complications that occur after repair of an injured di
gital flexor tendon.