Emj. Xenakis et al., LOW-DOSE VERSUS HIGH-DOSE OXYTOCIN AUGMENTATION OF LABOR - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 173(6), 1995, pp. 1874-1878
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of low-d
ose versus high-dose oxytocin regimens in the augmentation of labor. S
TUDY DESIGN: Three hundred ten term pregnancies requiring augmentation
of labor underwent randomization to receive either a low-dose or high
-dose oxytocin augmentation regimen. Maternal demographics, labor-deli
very data, and neonatal outcome were compared. RESULTS: The high-dose
oxytocin group had a significantly lower cesarean section rate, regard
less of parity (10.4% vs 25.7%, p < 0.001), with no differences in mat
ernal complications and neonatal outcomes. The time needed to correct
the labor abnormality was also significantly decreased (1.24 +/- 1.4 h
ours vs 3.12 +/- 1.6 hours, p < 0.001) in the high-dose group. CONCLUS
IONS: The use of a high-dose oxytocin regimen benefits both nulliparou
s and multiparous women requiring labor augmentation by significantly
lowering both the time necessary to correct the labor abnormality and
the need for cesarean section.