This paper reports two experiments that investigated the semantic dist
ance model (SDM) of relevance assessment. In the first experiment grad
uate students of mathematics and economics assessed the relevance rela
tionships between bibliographic records and hierarchies of terms compo
sed of classification headings or help-menu terms. The relevance asses
sments of the classification headings, but not the help-menu terms, ex
hibited both a semantic distance effect and a semantic direction effec
t as predicted by the SDM. Topical subject expertise enhanced both the
se effects. The second experiment investigated whether the poor perfor
mance of the help-menu terms was an experimental design artifact refle
cting the comparison of terse help terms with verbose classification h
eadings. In the second experiment the help-menu terms were compared to
a hierarchy of single-word terms where they exhibited both a semantic
distance and semantic direction effect.