Rationale and Objectives. We assessed the effects on the perceived qua
lity of faculty teaching of a resident evaluation form that solicits s
pecific comments on faculty strengths and weaknesses. Methods. An eval
uation form was devised that rated faculty on a scale of 1-10 in teach
ing conference qualify, availability, efficiency, and teaching. The fo
rm requested constructive comments on faculty strengths and weaknesses
. The forms were completed anonymously by residents at all levels. Ind
ividual results and means for the department were tabulated and provid
ed to each faculty member in a personal interview. Change in performan
ce was assessed by comparing faculty evaluation scores for 2 consecuti
ve years. Results. The mean faculty scores for teaching conference qua
lity, availability, efficiency, and teaching increased from 7.8, 7.9,
7.9, and 7.7 to 8.1, 8.3, 8.3, and 8.1 in each of the respective areas
. The scores of the faculty members who initially received the 10 lowe
st scores rose to an even greater extent (from 6.2, 6.2, 6.0, and 6.0
to 6.8, 7.4, 7.3, and 6.8 in each of the respective areas), whereas th
e scores of the faculty members who initially received the 10 highest
scores remained relatively constant. Conclusion. The perceived quality
of certain focused aspects of resident teaching can be modified by us
e of resident evaluations that solicit specific suggestions for improv
ement. With appropriate feedback, this is an effective tool for improv
ing the teaching performance of radiology department faculty, particul
arly those considered to be the weakest teachers.