Risk sensitivity (foraging responses to variances in food availability
) has been observed in numerous taxa, including fish, under conditions
of extreme temporal variance (i.e., between patch visits, no matter h
ow short the visit or the time between visits). Because fish can gener
ally survive for weeks without food, they are expected to and have bee
n observed to be risk-averse (i.e., prefer patches with low variance i
n food availability). We conducted patch choice experiments with indiv
idual bluegill sunfish, using an automated shuttlebox system, to test
their sensitivity to variance in food availability under temporal vari
ation that was less extreme and perhaps more realistic (i.e., 40-min f
eeding periods) than previous risk-sensitivity experiments. Because we
expected bluegills to be risk-averse, we offered one patch with no va
riance in food availability whereas the other patch exhibited variable
food as sampled from a normal distribution of food availability-mean
food availability was equal between patches. Simultaneously, we explor
ed food availability/temperature combinations above and below expected
maintenance ration to determine whether fish response depended on ene
rgy balance (i.e., growth potential) as estimated from a bioenergetics
model for bluegill. Even when energy balance was negative, bluegills
appeared risk-neutral (i.e., they did not respond to variance). In the
second set of experiments, bluegills were tested for risk sensitivity
with more extreme variance in food availability; the temporal distrib
ution again was based on a 40-min period. Bluegills were again risk-ne
utral. Bluegills were able to effectively sample and track changing re
sources at least over 40-min periods. Overall variance in food availab
ility over IO-min feeding periods appears not to be a major factor in
patch choice for bluegills. Bluegill patch use depends on encounter ra
tes with food items within a patch resulting in a foraging pattern bas
ed on mean food availability within a patch.