Here we address the following questions, How many structurally differe
nt entries are there in the Protein Data Bank (PDB)? How do the protei
ns populate the structural universe? To investigate these questions a
structurally nonredundant set of representative entries was selected f
rom the PDB, Construction of such a dataset is not trivial: (i) the co
nsiderable size of the PDB requires a large number of comparisons (the
re were more than 3250 structures of protein chains available in May 1
994); (ii) the PDB is highly redundant, containing many structurally s
imilar entries, not necessarily with significant sequence homology, an
d (iii) there is no clear-cut definition of structural similarity, The
latter depend on the criteria and methods used, Here, we analyze stru
ctural similarity ignoring protein topology. To date, representative s
ets have been selected either by hand, by sequence comparison techniqu
es which ignore the three-dimensional (3D) structures of the proteins
or by using sequence comparisons followed by linear structural compari
son (i.e., the topology, or the sequential order of the chains, is enf
orced in the structural comparison), Here we describe a 3D sequence-in
dependent automated and efficient method to obtain a representative se
t of protein molecules from the PDB which contains all unique structur
es and which is structurally non-redundant. The method has two novel f
eatures, The first is the use of strictly structural criteria in the s
election process without taking into account the sequence information,
To this end we employ a fast structural comparison algorithm which re
quires on average similar to 2 s per pairwise comparison on a workstat
ion, The second novel feature is the iterative application of a heuris
tic clustering algorithm that greatly reduces the number of comparison
s required, We obtain a representative set of 220 chains with resoluti
on better than 3.0 Angstrom, or 268 chains including lower resolution
entries, NMR entries and models, The resulting set can serve as a basi
s for extensive structural classification and studies of 3D recurring
motifs and of sequence-structure relationships, The clustering algorit
hm succeeds in classifying into the same structural family chains with
no significant sequence homology, e.g. all the globins in one single
group, all the trypsin-like serine proteases in another or all the imm
unoglobulin-like folds into a third, In addition, unexpected structura
l similarities of interest have been automatically detected between pa
irs of chains, A cluster analysis of the representative structures dem
onstrates the way the 'structural universe' is populated.