BACKGROUND: With wider use of laparoscopic antireflux surgery, failed
antireflux procedures are likely to become more common. METHODS: The c
auses of failure, management strategies, and outcome were analyzed in
a consecutive series of 105 patients with failed antireflux procedures
. RESULTS: Recurrent reflux was the most common primary symptom for re
ferral (44.7%), followed by dysphagia (32.3%), and a combination of dy
sphagia and reflux (15.2%), The reasons for failure were disruption of
the initial antireflux procedure (46%), a displaced repair (23%), a t
oo-tight or too-long fundoplication (10%), an unrecognized motor disor
der (9%), a paraesophageal or axial herniation (6%), or gastric denerv
ation (6%). Revisional surgery was required in 71 patients, and 34 pat
ients were managed conservatively. Intraoperative assessment during re
operation showed that technical errors during the initial procedure we
re responsible for failure in 40 of 71 patients. With an individual th
erapeutic approach, good results were achieved in 86% of patients unde
rgoing revisional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Technical factors and inapprop
riate patient selection are the most common reasons for failure of ant
ireflux surgery. An individual therapeutic approach based on an exact
analysis of the reasons for failure of the initial procedure is essent
ial for the successful management of these patients.