Background Ticlopidine, an antiplatelet agent, when compared with aspi
rin has been found to reduce the risk of stroke in high-risk patients,
ie, those with recent transient ischemic attack, reversible ischemic
neurological deficit, amaurosis fugax, or minor stroke. Its cost-effec
tiveness in such use, however, is unknown. Methods We developed a mode
l of primary stroke prevention in which a hypothetical cohort of 100 h
igh-risk men and women 65 years of age was assumed to receive either t
iclopidine (500 mg daily) or aspirin (1300 mg daily). Using published
data, we estimated lifetime incidence of stroke, life expectancy (unad
justed and adjusted for changes in quality of life), and lifetime medi
cal care costs associated with each therapy. Results Patients who rece
ive ticlopidine would experience two fewer initial strokes per hundred
than those treated with aspirin. Life expectancy would be extended by
approximately one-half month, and lifetime medical care costs (discou
nted at 5%) would increase by about $2300. The cost-effectiveness of t
iclopidine, compared with aspirin, is estimated to range from $31 200
to $55 500 per quality-adjusted life-year gained as the utility of lif
e after nonfatal stroke is assumed to vary from 0.75 to 0.95. Conclusi
ons Ticlopidine therapy to prevent stroke in highrisk patients is cost
-effective by current standards of medical practice.