This article describes the results of a research project which examine
d 171 alliances set up by competing firms in an international context.
It presents an empirically-based taxonomy of such alliances construct
ed on the basis of a set of variables chosen for their demonstrated or
assumed influence on the evolution and outcomes of strategic partners
hips. Three contrasted types of allliances are identified: quasi-conce
ntration alliances, market penetration alliances and shared supply all
iances. They differ according to two fundamental dimensions: their sym
metrical or dissymmetrical nature and the way in which they alter comp
etition. Legal structure, often emphasized in previous research on the
subject, does not emerge as a strongly discriminating factor. Hypothe
ses on the likely evolution and outcomes of each type of alliance are
derived from the taxonomy.