Background: Exposure for open cholecystectomy entails lateral, caudal
traction on the gallbladder infundibulum, which results in opening the
angle between the cystic and hepatic ducts. Laparoscopic cholecystect
omy (LC), as initially described, is done with cephalad traction on th
e gallbladder. We hypothesized LC exposure technique narrows the angle
between the cystic and hepatic ducts, placing them at increased risk
of injury. Methods: Twenty-three patients had routine LC. Cystic duct
cholangiography (IOC) was done with a flexible 5-Fr catheter via a per
cutaneous introducer placed anterior to the gallbladder. Exposure of C
alot's triangle was maintained with cephalad traction on the gallbladd
er fundus. IOC was repeated after allowing the organ to assume the ana
tomic position. The cholangiograms were inspected for significant diff
erences, and the angle of the cystic to the hepatic duct (CDHD) was me
asured by a blinded radiologist. Results: The mean angle of the cystic
to hepatic duct was 30 degrees +/- 19 degrees in the IOCs taken with
cephalad traction on the gallbladder fundus vs 59 degrees +/- 22 degre
es, P < 0.001, in the cholangiograms taken without traction. A filling
defect at the cystic-hepatic duct junction was present in 39% of IOC
taken with traction vs none without traction. The intrahepatic ducts w
ere seen in all films without traction, whereas the intrahepatic ducts
were not visualized in 13% of IOCs taken with traction. Conclusions:
From these data we conclude (I) extrahepatic biliary ducts may be at i
ncreased risk of injury during LC because of the exposure technique an
d (2) imaging bile ducts in the anatomic position may convey misleadin
g information about the relative location of important structures. Opt
imal exposure for dissection of Calot's triangle should utilize a seco
nd clamp on the infundibulum with lateral, caudal traction.