To evaluate the pronostic value of an elevated seric carcinoembryonic
antigen (CEA > 10 ng/ml) at diagnosis, in patients with lung cancer, a
pair study was done: couples of patients with same staging and histol
ogic type were established, one patient with high CEA level compared t
o one patient with normal CEA level (< 5.5 ng/ml). Other markers were
measured: neuron specific enolase (NSE), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)
or Cyfra 21-1. Survival was the end point of comparison. For 89 coupl
es created, patients with low CEA level had a better survival rate at
one year (p = 0.02), this prognosis advantage was confirmed by a compa
rison of survival curves with Mantel-Cox and Breslow test (p = 0.01),
but not by the signs test. These differences were also observed for th
e 71 couples of squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas, and the
apparied signs test was still not significant. The poor prognosis pers
isted for patients with high CEA level, when one another marker's leve
l (NSE or SCC or Cyfra 21-1) was increased, in comparison with patient
s with any marker increased. On 29 couples of all histological subtype
s or on the 25 couples of non small cell lung cancer, the signs test a
nd the comparison of survival Curves were significant, but not the I y
ear survival rate. This study shows that a CEA level grater than 10 ng
/ml at diagnosis is a poor pronostic factor in patients with lung carc
inoma, independent of the stage of disease and of the histologic type.