Ew. Peterson et J. Howland, PREDICTING RADON TESTING AMONG UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association [1995], 46(1), 1996, pp. 2-11
To determine covariates of radon testing behavior, we surveyed by mail
a random sample of all Boston University employees (N = 915) six to n
ine months after they had been informed of the availability of radon t
esting services through the University's medical center. The response
rate was 58%. Analysis suggests blue collar workers were underrepresen
ted within the response rate. Slightly more than half of the responden
ts (51%) were men. The majority (69%) were under the age of 45. Twenty
-seven percent of the respondents (N = 143) had tested their homes for
radon. Bivariate analysis revealed important differences between rado
n testers and nontesters. Testers were 12 times more likely to be home
owners than renters (p = 0.00), and were more knowledgeable about rad
on's characteristics and testing procedures (p = 0.00). Testers were m
ore likely to view radon as a serious problem (p = 0.00), to consider
radon testing efficacious (p = 0.00), and to consider themselves susce
ptible to exposure (p = 0.00). Testers were also less likely to percei
ve barriers to radon testing, Mie used logistic regression to compare
the usefulness of the Health Belief Model and the Diffusion of Innovat
ions Model in predicting radon testing. We concluded that the knowledg
e deficits and barriers to radon testing identified in this study shou
ld be targeted in radon educational interventions.